Best traffic sources for ACA and U65 health insurance calls
I've watched a lot of money get burned chasing "cheap leads" that never turn into a call, let alone a sale. Health insurance traffic, especially ACA and U65, is one of the more unforgiving verticals out there. Buyers are sharp, margins move fast during Open Enrollment, and compliance mistakes cost you way more than a bad cost-per-call ever will. Let's break down what actually works, what's overhyped, and where the real risk hides.
Google LSA and paid search: still the workhorse
Google Local Services Ads and standard Google Search remain the top performers for insurance calls. It's not close. Cost-per-call typically runs $15 to $60 depending on the state, the time of year, and how saturated the market is. During Open Enrollment, expect the top end of that range or higher in competitive states like Texas and Florida.
Here's the thing: search traffic works because the person is already looking for a plan. That's high intent by default. LSA has an added perk, too. It shows a Google-verified badge, which tends to lift answer rates because callers trust it more than a cold display ad. Agencies that run LSA alongside traditional search ads usually see a better blended cost-per-acquisition than either channel alone. LSA catches the "ready now" caller. Search ads catch people still comparing options.
The downside is obvious. Everyone knows this works, so competition is brutal, and your quality score matters more than your budget. If your landing page and call flow aren't tight, you'll get outbid by agencies willing to pay more because they convert better per call.
One-line takeaway: paid search is expensive because it works, not despite it.
Meta lead ads: cheap leads, thinner intent
Facebook and Instagram lead ads generate leads for $5 to $20 in many campaigns, which looks fantastic on a spreadsheet. The problem shows up downstream. These leads convert to actual phone calls at a noticeably lower rate than search traffic, because the person filling out the form wasn't necessarily looking for insurance. They were scrolling and got interrupted by an offer.
You can still make Meta work. It usually takes a pre-sell funnel, a quiz, or a video that builds enough context before the form even appears. Skip that step and you end up with a list of names that never pick up the phone or, worse, don't remember requesting anything. That second scenario creates TCPA exposure, and I'll get to that in a minute.
Meta traffic has its place, honestly. It's good for volume and retargeting, and it can feed a call center that has time to dial out. But if you need inbound calls right now, during a tight enrollment window, it's not your primary lever.
Native platforms and IVR: useful, but inconsistent
Taboola and Outbrain get used constantly for pre-sell content that funnels into call centers. The idea is simple. Someone reads an article about health coverage options, clicks through, and lands on a page designed to push them toward a call. It works, sometimes. Quality swings hard based on publisher placement, though. A native ad running on a well-trafficked news site behaves very differently than the same ad running on some low-quality content farm that Taboola happens to serve. Watch placement-level data closely, or you'll burn spend on traffic that never had real intent to begin with.
Free Email Course: Buying Insurance Calls
Learn how agents and agencies buy inbound calls that turn into sales, delivered in short lessons over email.
IVR-based traffic and click-to-call display ads are common in both U65 and Medicare, usually priced on a pay-per-call basis in the $10 to $40 range for a qualified call. These can work well, but "qualified" is doing a lot of work in that sentence. You need clear definitions in your contracts about what counts as qualified, how long the call has to last, and what happens with disputes. I've seen too many agencies get burned because their definition of a good call didn't match their vendor's.
Co-registration and survey leads: cheap for a reason
Co-reg and survey-based leads produce high volume at low cost, and they'll always look tempting when you're trying to hit a volume number for a client or a carrier. But the intent is weak. Someone filling out a sweepstakes form and checking a box about health coverage isn't the same as someone typing "affordable health insurance under 65" into Google at 9pm. Treat this traffic as a volume filler at best. Never your main source. And never without solid consent documentation attached to it.
Consent and TCPA: the part everyone skips until it hurts
This is the section people want to scroll past. It's also the one that matters most. TCPA compliance and consent verification get overlooked constantly when agencies evaluate a new traffic source. A lead can convert beautifully and still create serious legal exposure if you can't prove the consumer actually agreed to be contacted, by whom, and for what purpose.
I've sat across the table from agencies with great numbers on paper and no real audit trail behind their leads. That's a lawsuit waiting for a filing date. Before you scale any new source, ask for the consent language, the timestamp, the IP capture, and how long they retain records. If a vendor can't answer those questions clearly and quickly, that tells you everything you need to know.
Enrollment timing changes everything
Open Enrollment, November 1 through January 15, and Special Enrollment Periods triggered by qualifying life events drive the sharpest spikes in call volume and buyer competition. Costs climb, good traffic gets scarce, and agent capacity becomes the real bottleneck. Licensed agent availability and average handle time affect your actual cost-per-acquisition just as much as traffic quality does. A call that costs you $30 and gets answered by an agent already juggling four other calls is money down the drain.
If you're managing multiple buyers or trying to route calls in real time based on which agent has capacity, platforms like Ringba, Invoca, and Retreaver exist for exactly that reason. They let you bid, route, and track calls across sources instead of guessing.
And if you're more interested in building your own inbound call engine instead of buying traffic from someone else, that's a different conversation entirely. I actually wrote a full book about it, The Pay Per Call Revolution, along with a companion workbook that walks through it step by step.
FAQ
What's the best single traffic source for ACA calls during Open Enrollment? Google LSA combined with search ads, though costs rise sharply from November through mid-January due to competition.
Are Facebook leads worth it for U65 insurance? They can work as a volume supplement, but expect lower call conversion than search traffic unless you build a pre-sell funnel first.
How do I know if a traffic source is TCPA compliant? Ask for consent language, timestamp records, IP capture data, and retention policy before you scale spend with any vendor.
Does state matter for traffic segmentation? Yes. States running their own marketplace, like Covered California or NY State of Health, affect which carriers are eligible, so traffic and landing pages should be segmented by state rather than treated as one national pool.
Frequently asked questions
What's the best single traffic source for ACA calls during Open Enrollment?
Google LSA combined with search ads, though costs rise sharply from November through mid-January due to competition.
Are Facebook leads worth it for U65 insurance?
They can work as a volume supplement, but expect lower call conversion than search traffic unless you build a pre-sell funnel first.
How do I know if a traffic source is TCPA compliant?
Ask for consent language, timestamp records, IP capture data, and retention policy before you scale spend with any vendor.
Does state matter for traffic segmentation?
Yes, states running their own marketplace affect which carriers are eligible, so traffic and landing pages should be segmented by state.